No.1982[View All]
Sup. We jannies have been thinking for a few hours about changing certain rules, so as to better reflect our desires as a community. It's better if we all openly discussed this to arrive at more optimal conclusions.
<
The rules in question:
>6. You WILL NOT post Personally Identifiable Information without that person's consent. Consent is interpreted as voluntary approval.
>8. Pornography is allowed if spoilered (in the case of links, use markdown). Pornography dump threads (i.e. threads primarily dedicated to posting pornography) are banned.
>9. You WILL NOT post gore. Guro is allowed if spoilered.
<
In the case of rules 8 and 9, we are thinking of: 1. unbanning gore, and 2. unifying the rules. The idea being that guro/gore would be treated the same as pornography, i.e. spoiler it, and don't make dump threads.
Draft:
>(this would go above the rule list) NSFW is defined herein as contents depicting pornography and/or gore.
>#. NSFW is allowed if spoilered (in the case of links, use markup). NSFW dump threads (i.e. threads primarily dedicated to posting NSFW) are banned.
<
In the case of rule 6, the doxxing rule, we take into consideration the cultural status of doxxing as a weapon of sorts, to fend off undesirable persons.
Draft:
>1. Doxxing is allowed, with three conditions:
> a. The person must have infamy for their reprehensible actions toward others;
> b. The person must be at least tangentially relevant to the website;
> c. We reserve the right to delete doxes according to our judgement.
<
Feel free to suggest alternative drafts for the rules mentioned or anything else you'd like.
77 posts and 22 image replies omitted. Click reply to view. No.2063
>>2058The site should remain at least somewhat SFW. I am skeptical of whether anything good will come from allowing NSFW dump threads
>>2059>>2060>nobody ever checks /qa/ to report anything thats there>the jannies hate /qa/ and refuse to clean it upI'm sorry to hear that, I'll be paying attention more. Yell wherever you want if we're neglecting certain boards.
>>2061Picrel for you
No.2065
>>2063I know you’re scared of people being scared off or whatever by allowing it, but really think. This whole website is about making fun of people with drawings. Do you really want people who get mad at drawings using it?
No.2066
>>2035how about stealing derpibooru's captcha lole
place random 'jaks with random emotions in random places, to solve it you need to name their emotions correctly through a drop down menu. this can get brute forced by random clicking, but what if you add a detector that can see if the speed of choosing the options in the menu is not humanly possible and detected it as a bot, if that is even possible to implement. this will force the botter to make the random clicker slower or something
No.2067
>>2066Bro wants us to do a professor layton puzzle to post
No.2070
Chud !!Am4rD0Edg6
dumb ass nigger LOL
No.2072
>>2068Yeah, it's about the person posting it. Lolifags are utterly worthless and detrimental to the site
No.2073
>>2068Soyjaks were created to enrage and troll people. I feel that it’s necessary to be pretty unbothered about most things if you’re going to be a good troll. You’re also a part of what killed/ is killing most soy sites. You’re far too serious about this nonsensical website. Don’t take things so seriously, they’re just soy wojack memes
No.2074
kek someone is using the same
>if you don't like cp and bmt you're taking the site too seriously (=let me manipulate you into doing whatever i want)
argument i saw on the jarty yesterday
No.2075
>>2074Treating drawings as child porn only serves to lessen how serious child porn is viewed in the eyes of the average person
No.2076
>>2075drawings of what nigga.
No.2077
>>2067i really don't know what solutions to come up with, choosing emotions might easier for a newfag than variants. this can be a site wide captcha that expires after an hour or two or something or after a certain amount of posts. hm noo that'll make it annoying too hmm
No.2078
>>2075pedophile argument that means nothing, sexualizing children is inherently wrong in the general publics eye. nobody wants to see it. saying 1 form of child porn material is bad doesnt inherently make another any less bad
No.2079
>>2076A child. Even then, would you say a drawing of a murder is as bad as someone being murdered? Or a drawing of rape is as bad as rape itself? Of course not. People only think it is in this case because of the knee jerk reaction they have. They’re too caught up in the fact that they find it icky.
No.2080
>>2073Yes, there is a shock value element to 'jakking. However, above all, it is satire, especially of stereotypes.
I find that idea quite humorous in this case. Perhaps you look like this and say this.
>>2075It's child porn.
>>2079Yes, the reaction is the same. The disgust response doesn't care.
No.2081
>>2079why do you need to see images depicting sexualized children on the site?
No.2082
>>2080>It is the sameSite is ran by retards. Bring back Yeji.
No.2083
>bring me back
No.2086
>>2085
/b/ is a shithole with nigger porn, 8chan is dead(USER WAS BANNED FOR BEING A PEDOPHILE)
No.2087
>>2082It's drawn child porn. Categorically, it's child porn. Psychologically, the visceral attraction is very much the same.
Also. jfl. No /b/ isn't coming back. Lolis aren't coming back.
No.2088
>>2079nobody is talking about murder, they're talking about sexual depictions of children used for sexual gratification. it is a completely different scenario mentally and physically. if you were attracted to drawings of men id consider you gay, the same way i consider you a pedophile.
No.2090
>>2086…which is why you need to force your pedophilia onto everyone else? keeeeeeeeeeeeek
No.2091
>>2087Gonna buy the site and allow lolis
No.2093
>>2086>which is why i need to subvert your board to cater to my needs waaaaaahThis just shows lolicon niggers are worthless parasites. They don't have anything of worth on their own and are forced to leech off of someone who's not subhuman.
No.2094
>>2092
Wanna talk with lolibros
No.2095
>>2094theres only 2 of you and you can just erp on telegram if you want to so much
No.2097
yeji go take a shower you faggot
No.2098
>>2096
If it makes you so angry I might stay a while
No.2100
There is no point debating with pedophiles, they get off on telling you that they like kids. You will never make them see the light
No.2101
Anyways. Let us return to the thread's core discussion.
Is everyone OK with the new NSFW rule?
Is there anything we can do to improve the doxxing rule? I did answer a few questions, but I'm not sure if they clarified everything for you guys.
No.2102
>>249329
well gore being spoiler-only is fine I guess because it won't be used for coally spam
No.2104
>>2101deleted the file award.
No.2105
>>2102We'll see how it goes
>>2103meddies
>>2104Yep
No.2106
>>2103
im gonna touch you
No.2107
>>2066fuck off nigger
people with autism might have a hard time identifying emotions
No.2108
>>2066i think this is a fun and exciting idea don't listen to the haters
No.2111
>>2013but shouldn't nu-teens familiarize themselves with the site culture before making posts
I think the current captcha is le good in that regard
No.2112
>>2111it does force you to lurk a minimum amount
i dont think thats a bad thing at all
reminds me of that one otter site
No.2118
This sucks and is worth leaving the site over
Jump ship
No.2119
>>2118worlds biggest crybaby nigger award
No.2123
>>2075Ban this pedonigger
