/sgp/ - soygem.party

you wont do shit timmy

It was deleted by the OP.

>>1439
damn i wonder who this OP might be

>>1446
What do you want to hear? I'll tell you guys.
But there isn't anything malicious going on. A janny was being a retard and decided to leak an IP.
The OP of that thread deleted his own post and I banned the janny for breaching mod rule 1 which from now on will be actively reintroduced.

>>1447
>from now on
why now all of a sudden? nobody really cared until this moment.

>>1448
Meds now. I have no reason to go rouge like a retard on my own staff.
>>1449
Internally we don't treat this whole thing seriously but, after seeing this shitshow we might need to step up this shit and stop the namefagging since it just makes this site look like its run by faggots. This will extend to everyone except for svvt and the developer. This is why complaint threads from now on like this WILL start to be moved to /sgp/.
It's alot easier to have you guys let us know how you feel about shit on here and yell at us.

>>1450
>stop the namefagging since it just makes this site look like its run by faggots
really now?
>after seeing this shitshow
it had nothing to do with namefagging, that was just a one off comment nobody really cared about except for one person

was there ever an announcement or did this just happen without a warning?
why not sort it out on /j/ instead of actually provoking drama with public bans and revealing IPs? (since you want to avoid shitshows so much)
this is so dumb it almost looks intentional

>>1451
>really now?
More specifically the rampant abuse of it on /soy/. I know I can't be excused for doing that aswell.
>it had nothing to do with namefagging, that was just a one off comment nobody really cared about except for one person
Well the normalization of jannies revealing themselves on /soy/ i feel like really caused the retard to leak an IP. We really need reform the staff after this whole thing and talking to you guys on /sgp/ would help alot in finding out what people would want better.
>was there ever an announcement or did this just happen without a warning?
Internally No. But publically we're going to try and be more transparent.
>why not sort it out on /j/ instead of actually provoking drama with public bans and revealing IPs? (since you want to avoid shitshows so much)
The janny who did this has been punished already as of this post. My main job is going to be working to try and make the janny team less retarded. That's why I mentioned the mod rule.
sorry for this whole mess though, it's just a lot of unfortunate mistakes that caused a mess to happen.

>>1452
>Internally No. But publically we're going to try and be more transparent.
wow. amazing to say the least.
>The janny who did this has been punished already as of this post.
for doing something that hasn't been punished without a warning?

I knew that the whole mod team having access to complete banned IPs could lead to a disaster. In fact it'd probably be easy to stealthily ban someone and then delete the ban right after
Maybe it would be better if they were hashed like on the jarty, but I'm not expecting a solution anytime soon.

also op tell me where you would be going

>In fact it'd probably be easy to stealthily ban someone and then delete the ban right after
i said this the day the site was created

>>1455
I realized it at the very start too but never mentioned because realistically nobody is going to do shit about it

>>1453
>wow. amazing to say the least.
Yes I know it's not a good process.
>Maybe it would be better if they were hashed like on the jarty, but I'm not expecting a solution anytime soon.
I should get svvt to do that. I'd really like to avoid any jannies doing something like this again.
We're still basically operating this whole thing like how we did in February if you couldn't tell.

the jarty has never leaked user IPs and it's been around twice as long as the shemale. just saying.

Oh, good, something is being done about this.
>>1452
>and talking to you guys on /sgp/ would help alot in finding out what people would want better
The first sign of trouble was yeji, or whoever that mod was, just fucking around with the kolyma sperg and being pretty open about his identity. Call it gay, but the first function of staff in a community is to prevent chaos and degradation. That means they should have self-restraint themselves and know how to blend in with the rest of anons if they want to post normally so much. What should've been done is to just ban the rizzfag for a few days and leave it. But instead it resulted in a shitstorm. I guess it was a bit entertaining, but for some it can still be a huge turn-off. Huge show of unprofessionalism.
Also, if the rules are written, they should be followed. I was wondering why that fag was breaking Mod rule 1, and it turns out they're not enforced as much? Then it should be deleted from the rule page. It's always better to be consistent in these matters. I guess you are right that this slacking off on keeping the site tidy management-wise snowballed into the IP leaking. The reason I came here is that I heard a lot of bad stuff about that Froot guy, including his staff leaking IPs. And to see that being done here as well? Hell naaaw blud skull skull
Remember, quite a lot depends on authorities in communities, people seem to underestimate that and then be surprised that their community has failed, or went into a bad direction. I'll repeat myself here again: if the leader is a weak pussy wuss, then the team that he leads, no matter how individually skilled, will be a weak pussy wuss in spirit too.
I hope you guys will be a lot more strict with the jan-jans and how you run things here. I love this place so far and it's sad to see it being mishandled. It's good to have feedback and to not silence the userbase.

>>1459
>The first sign of trouble was yeji, or whoever that mod was, just fucking around with the kolyma sperg and being pretty open about his identity.
it's almost like a situation that warranted an actual penalty being projected onto someone else
but again, rules fot me but not for thee